In light of the recent memo regarding T-38 trained students will be universally assignable, we wanted to provide a look at potential contributing factors to the Air Force’s inability to integrate T-38 trained students into the fighter/bomber pipelines. However, as any 2011-2012 UPT grad can tell you, this is not a new policy; the UPT fighter-bomber pipeline has always been susceptible to throttling. While maintenance, manpower, and training timelines are often cited as issues, our research on this "new" policy did not uncover a specific published root cause for this problem.
However, we came across a RAND research paper published in 2023 that discusses the challenges of over-absorption (the inability to create Mission Ready pilots within the squadron) during a pilot shortage. Despite the details and findings from that report, the recent T-38 memo suggests the problem may be accelerating, as this study was published last year. Below is a summary of the key points from RAND study. I look forward to hearing your thoughts.
RAND Study Summary
The United States Air Force is grappling with a critical issue: a significant shortage of pilots, particularly in fighter squadrons. While efforts are underway to increase the production of new pilots, operational squadrons face a paradoxical problem. They are overwhelmed with an influx of inexperienced pilots but lack sufficient experienced ones to train them effectively. This complex situation is thoroughly explored in a comprehensive study titled "Hurry Up and Wait: Over-Absorption in a Pilot Shortage."
This article delves into the intricacies of pilot training, the impacts of recent policy changes, and how the Air Force can better manage its pilot workforce. By examining each chapter of the study, we aim to provide a detailed understanding of the challenges and proposed solutions.
Setting the Stage: The Pilot Shortage Paradox
The title "Hurry Up and Wait: Over-Absorption in a Pilot Shortage" encapsulates the core dilemma faced by the Air Force. There's a pressing need to increase the number of pilots, leading to an accelerated production process. However, downstream, operational squadrons are struggling. They are inundated with too many inexperienced pilots and not enough seasoned ones to provide the necessary training and mentorship.
Central to this issue are two recent policy changes:
Removing the Sortie Minimum Requirement: Aimed at speeding up the process of transforming inexperienced pilots into experienced ones by reducing the number of required sorties.
Implementing the REFORGE Concept: An acronym for Rebuilding the Fighter Forge, REFORGE is a comprehensive redesign of the fighter pilot training paradigm, utilizing new technology and innovative training methodologies.
This study examines the impact of these policies on the pilot training pipeline and explores potential outcomes for the Air Force.
Abstract: A High-Level Overview
The study highlights a significant pilot shortage within the Air Force, particularly among those qualified to fly fighter aircraft. Despite efforts to boost pilot production, training squadrons are experiencing over-absorption—an imbalance where there are too many inexperienced pilots and insufficient experienced ones to train them.
Using a simulation model, the research assesses two policy interventions:
Removing the Sortie Minimum Requirement
Implementing the REFORGE Concept
Findings indicate that both policies offer improvements over the current system, albeit to varying degrees. The study underscores the necessity for enhanced data practices and a systems-level approach to managing pilot training and absorption.
Introduction
Strategic Backdrop
For decades, the U.S. Air Force's primary focus was on countering terrorism. However, with the rising prominence of state actors like China and Russia, the Air Force's technological and tactical advantages are diminishing. This shift demands a more robust and well-trained pilot force to maintain national security.
The Pilot Shortage Crisis
Pilots are in high demand, not just within the military but also in the civilian sector. Commercial airlines are aggressively recruiting pilots, offering lucrative packages that make it challenging for the military to retain its talent. The severity of the situation prompted General Charles “CQ” Brown, Jr., the Air Force Chief of Staff, to warn that the service needs to "Accelerate Change or Lose."
Research Questions
The study poses two critical questions:
What drives absorption at the squadron level?
How do changes in operational squadron flight operations affect absorption?
These questions guide the analysis, aiming to balance pilot production with the squadrons' capacity to absorb and effectively train new pilots.
Background
The Air Force Fighter Pilot Life Cycle
Pilot Production begins with officer accession and proceeds through several training phases:
Initial Flight Training (IFT): Introduces new pilots to basic flight concepts.
Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT): Divided into basic flight training in the T-6 Texan II and advanced training in the T-38 Talon.
Track Assignment: Pilots are assigned to either the fighter/bomber track or the transport/heavy track based on performance and needs.
Pilot Absorption
After UPT, pilots enter the Pilot Absorption phase, transitioning from inexperienced to experienced status. This phase is challenging due to:
Training Demands: Inexperienced pilots require extensive training and mentorship.
Operational Commitments: Squadrons must balance training with executing combat missions.
Retention Issues: Experienced pilots are leaving the Air Force, exacerbating the shortage.
Pilot Retention Challenges
Many pilots opt to leave after fulfilling their initial service commitment, drawn by higher salaries and better quality of life in the civilian sector. The Air Force has implemented financial incentives, such as Aviation Incentive Pay and Aviation Bonuses, but these measures have had limited success in retaining pilots.
Force Structure Imbalance: The Pilot Bathtub
The Pilot Bathtub metaphor illustrates the imbalance between the influx of new pilots and the squadrons' capacity to absorb them. Without enough experienced pilots to mentor the newcomers, the system risks becoming unsustainable.
Research Approach
Simulation Modeling
The study utilizes a squadron-level, discrete-time, stochastic simulation model. This sophisticated model replicates real-world dynamics of pilot training and absorption within a squadron.
Conceptual Model Development
The model incorporates various factors:
Pilot Training Phases: Tracks progression from inexperienced to experienced status.
Sortie Requirements: Accounts for the number of sorties needed for experience.
Time Variables: Considers the duration of training phases and progression timelines.
Scenario Study
The model is employed to conduct a scenario study exploring the effects of:
Removing the Sortie Minimum Requirement
Implementing the REFORGE Concept
F-16 Application—Removing the Sortie Minimum
Policy Change Examination
This chapter applies the model to an F-16 squadron to assess the impact of removing the sortie minimum requirement.
Parameterization
Key inputs include:
Pilot Manning Levels: Number of pilots at various experience levels.
Sortie Requirements: Number of flights required for progression.
Squadron Composition: Ratio of inexperienced to experienced pilots.
Results
Time Reduction: The policy reduces the time for pilots to achieve experienced status.
Experience Level Decline: Overall squadron experience levels decrease.
Potential Risks: Lower experience levels may impact combat readiness and safety.
Implications
While the policy may alleviate immediate training bottlenecks, it could weaken the squadron's long-term effectiveness if not carefully managed.
F-22 Application—Modeling ACC REFORGE
Introduction to REFORGE
The REFORGE Concept aims to overhaul the traditional fighter pilot training pipeline by:
Utilizing a new aircraft designed for training.
Implementing advanced training methods to enhance efficiency.
Reducing reliance on primary aircraft sorties for experience.
Parameterization
Adjustments in the model include:
Aircraft Utilization Rates: Increased use of dedicated training aircraft.
Pilot Progression Timelines: Streamlined training phases.
Training Structures: Reorganized to maximize learning and efficiency.
Results
Improved Absorption Capacity: Squadrons can handle more inexperienced pilots.
Reduced Training Time: Pilots reach experienced status more quickly.
Resource Requirements: Significant investment in new aircraft and training infrastructure.
Implications
Implementing REFORGE could revolutionize pilot training but requires substantial planning, investment, and a shift in resource allocation.
Simulation Summary
Assumptions
The model assumes:
Fixed Sortie Availability: Consistent number of flights available for training.
Standard Progression Rates: Uniform timeframes for pilot advancement.
Stable Operational Environment: No unexpected disruptions.
Sensitivity Analysis
Variable Inputs: Changes in sortie rates or pilot retention can significantly affect outcomes.
Flexibility Need: Emphasizes the importance of adaptable planning.
Limitations
Unaccounted Disruptions: Maintenance issues or sudden deployments are not factored in.
Data Constraints: Relies on available data, which may not capture all nuances.
RAND Study Conclusion
Key Findings
Both policy interventions offer potential improvements in pilot absorption.
Effectiveness depends on implementation details and contextual factors.
A systems-level approach is necessary to address the complexity of the issue.
Recommendations
Enhance Data Practices: Improve data tracking and analysis for informed decision-making.
Holistic Management: Consider the entire pilot lifecycle in policy development.
Further Research: Explore additional interventions and their interactions within the system.
Analysis Conclusion
Form our point of view, moving the 'slider' of what is considered 'experienced' from the right to left is the same approach as cutting sorties from the syllabus to graduate students on time. Is it the actual 'experience' that matters, or is it simply the text on the squadron's LOX?
As far as REFORGE- that is still yet to be seen. The T-7A is supposed to drive that initiative, but the full operational capability of the T-7A isn’t expected until 2034, presenting a significant challenge for REFORGE’s implementation. Interim solutions, such as leasing aircraft, have been proposed, but as of now, the concept is still under development with no clear timeline for full implementation. So with these two proposals to address the over-absorption problem during a pilot shortage, we may not be seeing full classes of fighter/bomber graduates for quite some time.
Let me know what you think.
Comments